{
  "case_id": "DIG-DIS-2024",
  "canonical": "https://factualist.org/records/dig-dis-2024/risk-signals.json",
  "case_page": "https://factualist.org/records/dig-dis-2024/",
  "last_reviewed": "2026/06/10",
  "record_posture": "verification-risk signals only; no legal conclusion",
  "risk_signals": [
    {
      "signal": "distribution-control gap",
      "supports": "Reported post-termination distribution visibility and catalogue-control questions.",
      "does_not_prove": "Intent, legal liability, copyright infringement, or personal wrongdoing."
    },
    {
      "signal": "takedown-response gap",
      "supports": "Reported takedown / removal requests and unresolved response-log questions.",
      "does_not_prove": "That any removal status was unlawful."
    },
    {
      "signal": "platform-wide removal authority risk",
      "supports": "A distributor-control context can make DSP-network removal authority and logs material.",
      "does_not_prove": "Bad faith, intent, or legal responsibility."
    },
    {
      "signal": "metadata-authority gap",
      "supports": "Reported Spotify-derived metadata dependency, remix-title control friction, capitalization-control friction, and pre-delivery editing questions.",
      "does_not_prove": "Technical defect, deception, bad faith, or legal responsibility."
    },
    {
      "signal": "upload-first, correct-later risk",
      "supports": "Reported workflow risk that metadata corrections may occur after initial delivery and propagation.",
      "does_not_prove": "That any system was defective or that any metadata issue was intentional."
    },
    {
      "signal": "public-claims vs operational-record gap",
      "supports": "Official public materials emphasize control, metadata entry, worldwide delivery, transparent monthly invoices, immediate invoicing, and personal service, making unresolved control, metadata, and accounting logs material.",
      "does_not_prove": "That the public claims were false, that intent is established, or that legal liability is determined."
    },
    {
      "signal": "royalty-accounting gap",
      "supports": "Reported unpaid-revenue / accounting questions for a relevant period.",
      "does_not_prove": "That funds were diverted or finally adjudicated as payable."
    }
  ],
  "correction_path": "https://factualist.org/records/dig-dis-2024/right-of-reply/"
}