Pattern note for freelancers

Freelance Red Flags: Work Started Before Written Terms

Pattern note for independent creators. Seven red flags that appear when production work, subcontracting, and out-of-pocket costs begin before a written order or contract exists, and how the same pattern maps to the obligations of the Freelance Act in force since 1 November 2024.

Answer Engine Summary

Work before written terms is a recurring pattern in independent creative commissioning. The pattern is: begin work before a contract or purchase order exists, then advance subcontractor and remittance costs yourself. From that point the freelancer is committed without a footing.

The pattern, not a party

This note is teaching material. All proper names are removed and the parties are described only by role. It is not an allegation against any company or person.

Two signals mean stop

Seven red flags run in sequence. If two or more are visible at the same time, that is the point to stop and request written terms.

The new duty is immediate

Under the Freelance Act in force since 1 November 2024, the commissioning side must state work content, fee and payment due date immediately after commissioning, in writing or by an equivalent electronic record.

No retroactive application

Conduct that occurred before 1 November 2024 cannot be judged under the Act. The mapping here is forward-looking guidance, not a finding about any past project.

The duties are being enforced

Corrective guidance to 128 broadcasting and advertising businesses in December 2025, and published recommendations in May and June 2026 over unpaid trial work and fees set below the normal rate. The remedies ordered included paying the fee equivalent and raising fees retroactively.

Scope Note

The Pattern in One Line

Seven Red Flags in Sequence

The sequence below is abstracted from a documented case. Each step is ordinary on its own. The risk is cumulative.

Verbal approach through an intermediary

An intermediary asks whether you can take on a project that is outside your usual scope, and the request stays verbal.

Sequence
Step 1
Red flag
Scope and fee exist only as speech

A meeting ends with please go ahead

A kickoff meeting closes with encouragement to begin, but no purchase order or written trading terms follow.

Sequence
Step 2
Red flag
No purchase order and no written trading terms

Deliverables are requested early

You are asked to send strong material quickly so the client can show progress internally.

Sequence
Step 3
Red flag
Deliverables move before terms are fixed

You advance the out-of-pocket costs

Subcontractor fees and overseas remittance charges are advanced by you, either at the client's request or on your own initiative.

Sequence
Step 4
Red flag
Financial risk is carried forward by the freelancer

A stop instruction arrives after work has begun

Once material work is already done, the commissioning side says to pause until the contract and formal order are ready.

Sequence
Step 5
Red flag
The ladder is removed after the climb started

A lower figure appears afterwards

A fee is proposed after delivery, and it differs substantially from what you understood at the meeting stage.

Sequence
Step 6
Red flag
Fee stated after the fact

The draft contract stays in preparation

The contract draft is described as being prepared, and the preparation period continues without a date.

Sequence
Step 7
Red flag
Terms are postponed indefinitely

How Each Red Flag Maps to the Freelance Act

The table below maps each red flag to the corresponding duty under the Act on Optimization of Transactions with Specified Entrusted Business Operators, administered by the Japan Fair Trade Commission, the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

No purchase order and no written trading terms

Duty to state trading terms. After commissioning, the client must state the work content, the fee, the payment due date and other required items immediately, in writing, by email or by an equivalent electronic record.

Related step
Steps 2 and 7
Provision
Article 3(1)
Status
Pattern mapping only

Fee stated after the fact or set low afterwards

The fee is one of the required items that must be stated. Information published at the recruitment stage must also be accurate.

Related step
Step 6
Provision
Article 3(1)
Status
Pattern mapping only

Payment is stretched out

Payment due date. The fee must be set within 60 days from the date the deliverable is received, and as short a period as practicable. A separate 30-day rule applies to certain re-commissioning arrangements, and the fee must actually be paid by the due date set.

Related step
After step 6
Provision
Article 4, including Article 4(5)
Status
Pattern mapping only

Unilateral stop, refusal to receive, or repeated rework

Prohibited conduct for continuing commissions, including refusal to receive, fee reduction, return of deliverables and unjustified rework.

Related step
Step 5
Provision
Article 5(1)
Status
Pattern mapping only

Unpaid trial work or extras performed for the client's benefit

Prohibition on unjustified requests for economic benefit. A client may not have the operator provide work without payment for the client's own benefit in a way that unjustly harms the operator's interests.

Related step
Steps 3 and 4
Provision
Article 5(2)(i)
Status
Pattern mapping only

Fee set far below the normal rate for the same work

Prohibition on buying at an unreasonably low price. A client may not unilaterally set a fee markedly lower than the normal rate for the same or similar work without sufficient consultation.

Related step
Step 6
Provision
Article 5(1)(iv)
Status
Pattern mapping only

This is a mapping of patterns. Whether a specific case falls under a specific duty depends on the facts and the contract type, and is a matter for a lawyer or the responsible authority.

What Enforcement Has Actually Looked Like

The mapping above is not theoretical. Since the Act came into force the Japan Fair Trade Commission has issued guidance and published recommendations in sectors that commission individual creators. Every entry below is taken from the Commission's own press release, with the source linked in full.

Concentrated review of the broadcasting and advertising sectors

Following a survey of 30,000 commissioning businesses in sectors with frequent problem cases, and reports submitted by operators, the Japan Fair Trade Commission conducted a concentrated review of broadcasting and advertising businesses and issued corrective guidance to 128 businesses by October 2025 under Article 22. On the same day it published a note of points to observe for each provision of Article 5.

Date
10 December 2025
Provisions applied
Article 22 (guidance); points to observe published for each provision of Article 5

Recommendation over unpaid trial lessons

A music school operator was found to have had 1,674 specified entrusted business operators give unpaid trial lessons for the operator's own benefit, unjustly harming their interests. The recommendation requires the fee equivalent for those unpaid lessons to be paid promptly, subject to confirmation by the Japan Fair Trade Commission. The case reached the Commission through a request for measures from the Commissioner of the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency on 22 April 2026.

Date
19 May 2026
Business named in the release
Sheer Co., Ltd. (シアー株式会社)
Provisions applied
Article 5(2)(i)

Recommendation over unstated terms, late payment and unreasonably low fees

A musical instrument manufacturer that also operates lesson schools was found to have failed to state required items to 100 operators, to have set no payment due date and not paid 98 operators by the date the services were received, and to have unilaterally set trial-lesson fees between roughly 33.9 and 72.3 per cent below the fee for a normal lesson for 28 operators without sufficient consultation. The recommendation requires those fees to be raised retroactively to commissions placed from November 2024.

Date
22 June 2026
Business named in the release
Kawai Musical Instruments Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (株式会社河合楽器製作所)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 4(5), Article 5(1)(iv)

Recommendation over unstated terms and payment not made by the date of receipt

A news agency commissioning attendance at go and shogi events, photography, proofreading of match reports, writing for yearbooks and its own web media, illustration, translation of overseas releases and lectures was found to have failed to state the required items to 45 specified entrusted business operators, and to have set no payment due date and not paid 41 operators by the date the deliverable or service was received, over the period from 1 November 2024 to 13 February 2025.

Date
25 February 2026
Business named in the release
Kyodo News (株式会社共同通信社)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 4(5)

Recommendation over unstated terms, late payment and payment beyond 60 days

An electric utility commissioning support work in general affairs, public relations, human resources, accounting, legal, research and development and facility management was found to have failed to state the required items to 39 operators, to have set no payment due date and not paid 12 operators by the date the service was received, and to have set a due date beyond 60 days from that date for 2 operators and not paid within 60 days, over the period from 1 November 2024 to 17 September 2025.

Date
27 February 2026
Business named in the release
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. (中部電力株式会社)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 4(5)

Recommendation over unstated terms and payment not made by the date of receipt

A broadcaster commissioning the creation of video and audio data and director work for programme production was found to have failed to state the required items to 33 operators, and to have set no payment due date and not paid 32 operators by the date the deliverable or service was received, over the period from 1 November 2024 to 15 July 2025.

Date
16 March 2026
Business named in the release
TV Hokkaido Broadcasting Co., Ltd. (株式会社テレビ北海道)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 4(5)

Recommendation over unstated terms, late payment and transfer fees deducted from the fee

A broadcaster commissioning script writing, appearance, hair and make-up and styling for programme production was found to have failed to state the required items to 132 operators, and to have set no payment due date and not paid 110 operators by the date the deliverable or service was received. For 67 operators engaged for a month or more it deducted bank transfer fees from the fee without a written or electronic agreement and without any fault on the operator's side. The recommendation requires the deducted amounts to be paid promptly.

Date
31 March 2026
Business named in the release
Kyoto Broadcasting System Company Limited (株式会社京都放送)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 4(5), Article 5(1)(ii)

Recommendation over unstated terms and fee reductions totalling about 5.5 million yen

A company subcontracting the preparation of proposal documents was found to have failed to state the required items to 236 operators, and, without any fault on the operators' side, to have deducted 4,463,380 yen in total from the fees of 148 operators as a compliance handling cost adjustment and 1,055,754 yen in total from the fees of 29 operators as one eleventh of the fee. The recommendation requires 5,519,134 yen in total to be paid promptly to 160 operators.

Date
29 May 2026
Business named in the release
Timewitch Inc. (株式会社Timewitch)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 5(1)(ii)

Recommendation over unstated terms and payment not made by the date of receipt

A publisher commissioning manuscript writing was found to have failed to state all or part of the required items to 82 operators, and to have set no payment due date and not paid the same 82 operators by the date the deliverable or service was received.

Date
11 June 2026
Business named in the release
Heritage Inc. (株式会社ヘリテージ)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 4(5)

Recommendation over unstated terms and payment not made by the date of receipt

A publisher commissioning manuscript writing was found to have failed to state all or part of the required items to 113 operators, and to have set no payment due date and not paid the same 113 operators by the date the deliverable or service was received.

Date
11 June 2026
Business named in the release
KADOKAWA Corporation (株式会社KADOKAWA)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 4(5)

Recommendation over unstated terms, late payment blamed on paperwork, and transfer fees deducted

A production company commissioning manuscripts, design, photographic data and event hosting was found to have failed to state all or part of the required items to 84 operators, to have failed to pay 31 operators by the agreed due date on the grounds that an invoice arrived late or its own paperwork was delayed, and to have deducted bank transfer fees from the fees of 36 operators without a written or electronic agreement and without any fault on their side. The release records that the deducted amounts were paid on 4 June 2026.

Date
18 June 2026
Business named in the release
S.P.C. Inc. (株式会社エス・ピー・シー)
Provisions applied
Article 3(1), Article 4(5), Article 5(1)(ii)

Recommendation over late payment, fee reductions and refusal to pass on cost increases

A home appliance retailer commissioning air conditioner installation work was found to have failed to pay 10 operators by the agreed due date, to have deducted 2,472,995 yen in total from the fees of 17 operators as an administrative handling charge, a commissioning management charge or a reconciliation statement cost without any fault on their side, and to have unilaterally kept the fee for 10 operators unchanged without sufficient consultation on reflecting increased installation costs. The release records that both amounts were settled on 12 June 2026.

Date
24 June 2026
Business named in the release
Beisia Denki Co., Ltd. (株式会社ベイシア電器)
Provisions applied
Article 4(5), Article 5(1)(ii), Article 5(1)(iv)

None of this is applied to any project predating 1 November 2024, and none of it is a finding about the record linked at the foot of this page. It is included to show what the current duties look like when they are enforced.

Each entry states only what the linked press release states, as at its publication date. Businesses are named because the Japan Fair Trade Commission named them in an official published recommendation. This page adds no characterisation beyond the release and does not track what each business did afterwards. For current status, read the linked release and any subsequent announcement by the business.

Routes Available If the Same Pattern Occurs Today

If the seven-step pattern runs today, the freelancer is no longer limited to negotiation. The following routes exist in parallel and are not mutually exclusive.

Report to the authorities

A freelancer may report the facts to the Japan Fair Trade Commission or the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency. Reports feed the concentrated reviews that produced the guidance and recommendations recorded above.

Route number
Route 1
Route type
Administrative or advisory route

Request for measures

The Commissioner of the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency may investigate and, where the facts are found, request the Japan Fair Trade Commission to take appropriate measures. Both 2026 recommendations reached publication through this or an equivalent path.

Route number
Route 2
Route type
Administrative or advisory route

Recommendation and publication

Where a violation is found, the Commission issues a recommendation and publishes it with the business name, the facts and the articles applied. The remedy ordered has included paying the fee equivalent and raising fees retroactively.

Route number
Route 3
Route type
Administrative or advisory route

Free consultation and mediation

Freelance Trouble 110-ban handles unpaid fees, missing contracts, repeated rework and harassment. Consultation is free and can be anonymous, and it extends to a settlement mediation procedure.

Route number
Route 4
Route type
Administrative or advisory route

Civil claim

Administrative routes do not replace a civil claim. Recovery of an unpaid fee remains a separate civil matter, and the dated written record built during the engagement is what supports it.

Route number
Route 5
Route type
Civil claim route

Pre-Engagement Checklist

Where to Get Help

Freelance Trouble 110-ban is commissioned by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and operated by the Daini Tokyo Bar Association. It covers disputes between freelancers and commissioning businesses, including unpaid fees, missing contracts, repeated rework and harassment. Consultation is free and can be anonymous, and it extends to a settlement mediation procedure.

Freelance Trouble 110-ban

Free and anonymous consultation with lawyers, plus settlement mediation. Phone and email are the main channels, with in-person and online options as needed.

FAQ

Does this note accuse any named company or person?

No. This note removes all proper names and records only the recurring pattern. It makes no allegation of misconduct and reaches no legal conclusion about any party.

Does the Freelance Act apply retroactively to older projects?

No. The Act on Optimization of Transactions with Specified Entrusted Business Operators came into force on 1 November 2024. It cannot be applied retroactively to conduct that occurred before that date. The mapping in this note is forward-looking guidance.

How many red flags should trigger a stop?

Two or more visible at the same time is a practical threshold to pause and request written terms. A single red flag can still be worth raising in writing.

Is starting work before a signed contract always a problem?

Not always. The risk becomes material when scope, fee and payment date remain unstated, when third-party costs are advanced by the freelancer, or when the commissioning party is not identified.

Which businesses have been named in published recommendations under the Act?

As at July 2026 the Japan Fair Trade Commission has published two recommendations naming the business. Sheer Co., Ltd. on 19 May 2026, over unpaid trial lessons given by 1,674 specified entrusted business operators. Kawai Musical Instruments Manufacturing Co., Ltd. on 22 June 2026, over required items never stated, payment not made by the date services were received, and trial-lesson fees set between roughly 33.9 and 72.3 per cent below the normal rate. Separately, 128 broadcasting and advertising businesses received corrective guidance in December 2025 and were not individually named. Both recommendation releases are linked in the source notes.

What conduct is the Commission actually acting on?

Across the published actions the recurring conduct is work performed without payment for the client's benefit, fees set far below the normal rate for the same work, required terms never stated in writing, and payment made after the date services were received. Those are the same moves that appear as red flags three, four, six and seven in the sequence above.

Where can a freelancer get free advice?

Freelance Trouble 110-ban is a service commissioned by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and operated by the Daini Tokyo Bar Association. Consultation is free and can be anonymous, and it also offers a settlement mediation procedure.

Source Notes

These are official sources for the current duties. They do not resolve any specific dispute and they do not determine whether a given project breached a duty.

Freelance Act pamphlet

Japan Fair Trade Commission pamphlet covering the duty to state trading terms, the payment due date and prohibited conduct.